‘Drunk’, ‘Rape’, and ‘Slut’ all on the same page? No good can come of that.
These RTB exchanges have a lot to answer for. It pains me that I can’t work out which network or agency is actually serving this ad. They live for another day…
COI, stop shitting away money.
This is a terrible placement! Everyone knows you don’t want food while you’re on cocaine. Keep working on those algorithms RocketFuel.
I get it. It’s testicles that look like famous people. It’s funny. I just don’t think it’s any place for TalkTalk.
Not poor Zulily again! It’s like someone is buying ad space to create content for my blog.
I’m no World War II expert, but I do know the Nazis took away anything of value from the prisoners, including their shoes… So Clarks serving a shoe advert beside a Hitler tribute is [insert missing adjective here]
This is what happens when your parents share a computer:
Mum shops at John Lewis.
Dad enjoys his special “me time”.
Criteo can’t believe their luck, their female target audience on a site with cheap traffic! Could it be so? No Criteo, no it can’t. Stop buying soft porn.
Are bums presenting themselves appropriate content? I can’t decide. I mean, it’s not full frontal nudity but it’s not exactly the Wall Street Journal.
Keeping the Olympic Spirit… I’m sure Usain Bolt wouldn’t be unhappy with this placement… but Visa, I’m not so sure…
Anything’s possible with BT infinity, even group sex.